Book Report of The Scarlet Letter - 680 Words

In June 1642, the townspeople of the Massachusetts Bay Colony gathered together in front of the scaffold to see the the punishment that would be levied on the young women, Hester Prynne. Hester Prynne was guilty of adultery and forced to stand upon the scaffold for three hours. While Hester was standinding on the scaffold, she was subject to name calling and constant questioning, by the other women of the town. As Hester was being shamed, she noticed and man in the crowd, it was her husband, who was presumed to be dead. Her husband, angered deeply by this, vowed to find the man responsible for this, and selected the new name Roger Chillingworth. The reverend, John Wilson, and the Minister, Arthur Dimmesdale questioned Hester, but she refused to reveal the the father. Hester then returned to her cell and Roger Chillingworth was brought into the cell to attempt to calm her and Pearl down. Chillingworth then proceeded to send the jailer on his way, and demanded that Hester tell him who the father was. She refused. Since Hester knew that Chillingworth was her long lost husband, Chillingworth insisted that Hester never reveal that they were married. Chillingworth said that if Hester does, he would ruin the real fathers life. Hester agreed reluctantly fearing that she may come to regret her decision. Hester took residence in a cabin at the edge of town and lived with her young daughter Pearl. Hester became perplexed by the young childs actions, as she watched herShow MoreRelated The Symbolic Use of Nature in Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter1376 Words   |  6 PagesThe Symbolic Use of Nature in The Scarlet Letter      Ã‚     In Nathaniel Hawthornes classic The Scarlet Letter, nature plays a very important and symbolic role.   Hawthorne uses nature to convey the mood of a scene, to describe characters, and to link the natural elements with human nature.   Many of the passages that have to do with nature accomplish more than one of these ideas.   All throughout the book, nature is incorporated into the story line. The deep symbolism conveyed by certain aspectsRead MoreABy Major Characters In The Scarlet Letter1202 Words   |  5 PagesThe Interpretation of the ‘A’ by Major Characters in The Scarlet Letter People have different cultures and experiences throughout their lives; therefore, they all have different perspectives of the same object. Various authors use different perspectives of people to make objects mean different based on how people approach it. Not only the readers see the object in different ways, but also the characters in the story. The Scarlet Letter uses various symbolism such as ‘A , rosebush, the forestRead More Scarlet Letter Literary Criticism Essay883 Words   |  4 Pages Scarlet Letter Literary Criticism nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;All great stories have thorough reports from several different literary critics, what do they have to say on The Scarlet Letter? The Scarlet Letter in the nineteenth century is comparable to early twentieth century and late twentieth century criticism. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Early nineteenth century critics think the story was a tremendous work of art. A â€Å"Review of New Books† thought the story is â€Å"a genuine native romance†Read More Greatest Sinner in Nathaniel Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter Essay1267 Words   |  6 PagesThe Greatest Sinner in The Scarlet Letter      Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Mankind is prone to some degree of sin. A question that has always plagued mankind is how one can achieve redemption from sin. Any sin becomes compounded when the perpetrator does not take responsibility for it. In the book The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, perhaps the greatest sinner was Reverend Arthur Dimmesdale.    Many of Hawthornes works center around what is right or wrong, and the consequences of breaking the basicRead MoreScarlet Pimpernel Reflection1126 Words   |  5 PagesScarlet Pimpernel starts with giving the background of the situation about how famed the scarlet pimpernel is and how badly the French want to kill him, through dialogue in France. The book moves the set to The Fishermen’s Rest and we see some of the aristocrats who have just escaped thanks to Scarlet Pimpernel and his crew. Lots of celebration continues as we get introduced to the main character Marguerite, she says good bye to her brother/Best friend/substitute dad, who is secretly helping scarletRead MoreAnne Hutchinson And The Scarlet Letter1008 Words   |  5 Pagessome of the standard Puritan views, and was subsequently banished from the Massachusetts Bay Colony. I will use the texts A Report on the Trial of Mrs. Anne Hutchinson, before the church in Boston, March, 1638 by Franklin Bowditch Dexter and Ma gnalia Christi Americana by Cotton Mather to outline the importance of the historical figure of Anne Hutchinson to The Scarlet Letter and to the novel’s main character, Hester Prynne. I will outline the common points and the striking differences between theirRead MoreThe Works of Nathaniel Hawthorne1175 Words   |  5 Pagesgrandfathers’ involvement in the Salem witch trials. Hawthorne boarded with a poet named Thomas Green Fessenden on Hancock Street in Beacon Hill Boston. After his strategic move to join with this poet he started to get into the flow of producing good books people wanted to read. When readers started to understand Hawthorne’s use of Dante, Spencer, and the Bible this helped them to better understand Hawthornes’ imagination. Hawthorne married Sophia Peabody in 1836 as they united with a farm to saveRead More The Mysterious Forest in Nathaniel Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter1011 Words   |  5 PagesThe Mysterious Forest in Nathaniel Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In Nathaniel Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter, life is centered around a rigid Puritan society. In this society, people are not allowed to express their true thoughts and feelings. Every human being needs the opportunity to express how they truly feel; otherwise the emotions become bottled up until they begin to hurt the person. Unfortunately, the puritans were not allowed this type of expression. Luckily, at least for the fourRead MoreThe Scarlet Letter, By Nathaniel Hawthorne1229 Words   |  5 Pagesthe villain, is someone who has a diabolical plan towards someone or something. The definition of a villain is, a cruelly malicious person who is involved in or devoted to wickedness or crime; [a] scoundrel (dictionary.com). In the novel, The Scarlet Letter, by Nathaniel Hawthorne, Roger Chillingworth displays the qualities of being a villain, making him the antagonist of the story. Throughout the story Roger has an ulterior motive and his actions were diabolical, qua lifying his as a villain. AlthoughRead More Hester Prynne, of Nathaniel Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter, and Margaret Fuller, Themid-nineteenth-century Campaigner for the Rights of Women2901 Words   |  12 PagesPrynne, of Nathaniel Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter, and Margaret Fuller, Themid-nineteenth-century Campaigner for the Rights of Women Endowed in certain respects with the sensibility of Margaret Fuller, the great campaigner for the rights of women, Hester Prynne is as much a woman of mid-nineteenth-century American culture as she is of seventeenth-century Puritan New England. Is this an accurate assessment of Nathaniel Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter? Margaret Fuller (1810-1850) was an

Rap and Hip Hop Culture Free Essays

It was 1977, and the Summer of Sam was in full swing in New York. But in the neighborhoods and housing projects of the â€Å"boogie down† Bronx New York, a new art form was developing called Hip Hop. This new art form would change America and transcend a generation forever with its influences on fashion, music, and lifestyle. We will write a custom essay sample on Rap and Hip Hop Culture or any similar topic only for you Order Now Hip Hop is an urban lifestyle that consists of different subgenres of music such as rap, â€Å"old school† rap and â€Å"gangsta† rap. In my paragraph, I’m going to do a comparison on hip hop and rap. On the surface, they may seem the same, but their just as different as they are alike. In the hip hop subculture, two of the most standard types of music are called rap and hip hop. But there is a thin, fine line that defines the differences between rap and hip hop. In my opinion and many other fans and followers opinions, is that hip hop is a culture, that consists of more things than just music. From clothes styles, slang words, and dances such as breakdancing and more current dances like â€Å"Teach Me How to Dougie†. While rap is a style of music that comes from the culture and has many different genres like â€Å"Old School† and â€Å"Gangsta† rap an is expressed through spoken word to a beat. Hip hop and rap are the same yet so different, because rap is hip hop but hip hop can never be rap. Because Hip Hop is the culture itself, and rap is how the culture explains itself through rhythmic beat and spoken word. In recent years, hip hop has been portrayed in the media as a bad thing. But for anyone who knows and loves the roots of this American icon called hip hop, knows that hip hop music and culture isn’t always negative, and never was conceived and given to the masses of people to start a negative based culture in which it is portrayed today. I am Hip Hop; and yes I do love her. How to cite Rap and Hip Hop Culture, Essay examples

Commercial Bank Of Australia Ltd V Amadio -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Commercial Bank Of Australia Ltd V Amadio? Answer: Introducation At the time of the execution of the mortgage, bank had knowledge about the unstable financial situation of Amadios son and bank was also aware that Mr. and Mrs. Amadio do not have any such knowledge. Bank also failed in informing the Amadio that there liability was not limited as guarantors (ACL, n.d.). In this case, Court of Appeal set aside the decision of the trial judge on the basis of following reasons: Court stated that bank was under obligation to present the actual position of the accounting of the company, but bank failed to fulfill this obligation which made them liable for Vincenzo's misrepresentations. In this context, Court assumes that knowledge of Mr. Virgo was the knowledge of bank. Therefore, it can be said that bank was liable for unconscionable conduct because they enter into the transaction without disclosing relevant facts to Mr. and Mrs. Amadio. Court further held that this transaction was unconscionable in nature because in this bank take undue advantage of his superior position against the other party who suffer from special disability (Law Teacher, n.d.). In this case, Justice Gibbs stated some exceptional circumstances in which bank were obliged to disclose the position of the accounts: Bank was under obligation to made disclosure to the surety any such transaction which take place between the bank and the principal debtor and such transaction was not naturally to be expected. In this justice Gibbs quoted Pollock MR in Lloyds Bank Ltd v Harrison Bank was also under obligation to disclose if any unusual features occurred in the particular case related to the particular account which was to be guaranteed. Two circumstances of the case which was define by Justice Gibbs to hold the bank liable for disclosure: Bank was liable to made disclosure to Mr. and Mrs. Amadio about the consistent exceeding of overdraft limit, and the cheques were being dishonored. Another circumstances in which bank were liable to disclose was the arrangement made between the bank and Vincenzo Amadio on behalf of the company. As per this management, company gets the immediate limit on overdraft of $270,000 on the condition that company reduced this limit to $220,000 within a week, and with a further deduction to $180,000 within a fortnight. It can be said that, within the period of three weeks limit of overdraft was to be reduced less than the debit balance which already existed. Justice Gibbs addressed two torts in this case on the basis of above stated circumstances: Express Misrepresentation- There was express misrepresentation which induced the couple to sign the document. However, this misrepresentation was not made by the agent or servant of the bank but it was made by the Vincenzo Amadio. In this judge quoted case of Gutch v Homan [1853] EngR 883; (1853) 4 HLC 997, at pp 1034-1035(10 ER 752, at p 767). Unconscionable conduct- in this judge stated that there was no evidence of unconscientious bargain, but it can be said that both the parties that were creditor and the surety did not execute the transaction on the equal terms. Justice Mason gives his assent to the conclusion of Justice Deane Js that the respondent were entitled to seek relief on the fact that bank was guilty of unconscionable conduct in context of execution of mortgage deed by the respondents. In this regard, relied was provided by the Court if one party takes the unconscientiously advantage of the innocent party whose will was overborne which means will was not independent and voluntary. In other words, will was granted when other party take such advantage of an innocent party. Therefore, in this case bank was also liable for unconscionable conduct and Mr. and Mrs. Amadio can seek relief on the basis of this ground. Justice Mason further stated that number of factors was there which proves that there was gross inequality of bargaining power between the parties that were bank and the respondent, in such manner as respondent lies in the position of special disadvantage in context of execution of mortgage deed with the bank. It can be said that ability of respondents for the purpose of judging their best interest in context transaction with the bank was lacking. Mason further stated that respondents suffer special disadvantage and that special disadvantage was their dependency on and their confidence in their son who misrepresents the facts for the purpose of executing the mortgage deed for his own interest. Both Justice Mason and Justice Deane define the difference between the unconscionable conduct and undue influence: Justice Deane stated that equitable principles dealing with the unconscionable conduct and undue influence were closely related with each other. However, these two doctrines were completely different from each other. Undue influence was considered as common duress which considers the superiority related to the consent or assent of the weaker party. On the other hand, unconscionable conduct consider the action and behavior of the stronger party in context of retaining and enforcing the benefit while dealing with the person suffers from special disadvantage in those situations when it does complied with the equity or good morals. The adverse situations which consider the special disadvantage in context of principles relating to relief against unconscionable dealing include various forms. Justice Mason also stated the difference between the two and stated that in case of undue influence party was not independent and voluntary because it was overborne. On the other hand, in case of unconscionable conduct will of the party was result of the disadvantageous position, even though it was independent and voluntary. In this, other party took the unconscientiously advantage of their position (High Court of Australia, n.d.). In this case, Mr. and Mrs. Amadio were considered as weaker party in context of transaction between the respondent and the bank. Weakness of party includes a special disability of Mr. and Mrs. Amadio while dealing with the bank, and on this ground respondent seeks relief against unconscionable dealing. Court also consider some other facts such as their age, limited knowledge of English, situation and marketing in which documents was presented by the bank to the respondents for the signature. The most important ground was the lack of knowledge and understanding in context of document. They did not get any assistance and independent advice which was necessary for establishing any kind of equality between the parties. Following were the circumstances under which bank was liable towards the guarantor: It was necessary for bank to disclose the matter which was taken place between the bank and principle debtor, and such transaction was not naturally expected by the perspective guarantor. Bank was also liable towards the guarantor if the guarantor was short of non est factum, which means he had been induced to provide guarantee on the basis of misrepresentation or other impropriety by its customer or a third party. References: ACL. Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio, (1983) 151 CLR 447; [1983] HCA 14. civil-engineering at: https://www.australiancontractlaw.com/cases/amadio.html. Accessed on 23rd January 2018. Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; (1983) 151 CLR 447 (12 May 1983). Gutch v Homan [1853] EngR 883; (1853) 4 HLC 997, at pp 1034-1035(10 ER 752, at p 767). High Court of Australia. Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; (1983) 151 CLR 447 (12 May 1983). Available at: https://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/1983/14.html. Accessed on 23rd January 2018. Law Teacher. Commercial Bank Of Australia V Amadio. Available at: https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/contract-law/commercial-bank-of-australia-v-amadio-contract-law-essay.php. Accessed on 23rd January 2018. Pollock MR in Lloyds Bank Ltd v Harrison (1925). Wiley. Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio and another. Available at: https://www.johnwiley.com.au/highered/blaw/content110/case_summaries/bank_of_australia_vs_amadio.pdf. Accessed on 23rd January 2018.