Saturday, January 25, 2020

The change kaleidoscope

The change kaleidoscope Table of content Introduction Describe the strategic change context in 2002, at the start of the change process at Faslane. You should apply Balogun and hope Hailey’s change Kaleidoscope and discuss your findings. You should also briefly describe the type of change (use Balogun and hope Hailey’s type of changes model). You may additionally use any other relevant academic reading to develop and support your ideas. 1.1 Balogun and hope Hailey’s change Kaleidoscope. 1.2 The kaleidoscope Change Kaleidoscope 1.3 The contextual features of change in Faslane , (Kaleidoscope Model ) 2. Compare and contrast the internal features of the organizational when it was run by the MOD and Royal Navy (Up to 2001) with when it was run by Babcock Marine (2002-2010). You should apply McKinsey’s Seven S framework (do this twice – once for ‘up to 2001’ and once for 2002-2010) and discuss your findings. What, for example, where the most significant differences? You may additionally use any other relevant academic readings to develop and support your ideas. 2.1 McKinsey’s Seven S framework 2.1.1 Importance of McKinseys Seven S structure 2.1.2 McKinsey’s Seven S framework 2.2 Faslane run by the Royal Navy and MOD (up to 2001) 2.3 Falsane run by the Babcock Marine (2002-2010) 3.Critically evaluate the Faslane change using Kotter’s change steps. 4.Would you describe the strategic change process at Faslane as more â€Å"intended† or more â€Å"emergent†? You should use examples from the case and relevant academic reading to support your answer Conclusions Introduction The main aim of this paper is to focus on the strategic changes at Faslane from different perspectives of the Babcock marines and the Ministry of Defense (MOD). The objective is to understand the change and the studies of strategic leadership. Taking into consideration a number of different theories and models to analyze internal and external influences of the organization. In the year 2002 Faslane which was previously managed jointly by the Ministry of Defense and the Royal Navy decided to partner with Babcock Marine, a private sector company. The main aim of such partnering agreement was for the purpose of reducing cost and improving their services. Babcock Marine was given the responsibility to save the cost as well as to improve their operational effectiveness. They were given a target of  £76 million saving within five years. With a significant change Faslane was able to achieve the target and was considered best. Describe the strategic change context in 2002, at the start of the change process at Faslane. You should apply Balogun and hope Hailey’s change Kaleidoscope and discuss your findings. You should also briefly describe the type of change (use Balogun and hope Hailey’s type of changes model). You may additionally use any other relevant academic reading to develop and support your ideas. Balogun and hope Hailey’s change Kaleidoscope Change Kaleidoscope was produced by Hope Hailey Balogun (2002) to be a method for pulling together and arranging the extensive variety of logical highlights and usage choices that require thought amid change. In this sense Change kaleidoscope is even more a model than a strategy, however it is usable instrument for conceptualizing the way of progress. By its plan, the model speaks to an exhaustive system which manages the greater part of the variables that the creators regarded noteworthy by the writing. The kaleidoscope model was utilized interestingly to reflectively investigate a change project embraced in a first pharmaceutical organization. The kaleidoscope contains an external ring which is concerned with the highlights of the change setting that can either empower or oblige change, and an inward ring that contains the menu of usage choices open to change specialists. Comprehension of the context oriented highlights empowers change specialists to judge the fittingness of any methodology for their specific setting. 1.2 The kaleidoscope Change Kaleidoscope The kaleidoscope Change Kaleidoscope theory was developed by Hope Hailey Balogun has three rings: The outer ring relays to the broader strategic adjustment context. The central ring relays to specific contextual issues that need to be considered when expressing a revolution plan. The internal circle gives a set of choices of selections and interferences, design selections obtainable to change. Time -How rapidly is change required? Is the association in emergency or is it concerned with longer-term vital improvement? Scope -What degree of change is needed? Does the change affect the whole organization or only part of it? Preservation -What authoritative resources, attributes and practices need to be kept up and secured amid change? Diversity -Are the diverse staff, expert gatherings and divisions inside the association generally homogeneous or more various as far as qualities, standards and disposition? Capability -What is the level of authoritative, administrative and individual capacity to execute change? Is there a need to enhance this ability before the change methodology can be begun? Capacity -How much asset can orgnaisation INVEST in the proposed change as far as money, individuals and time? Readiness for change How prepared for change are the representatives inside the association? Is it accurate to say that they are both mindful of the requirement for change and roused to convey changes? Power -Where is the force vested inside the association? What amount of scope of carefulness does the unit expecting to change and the change pioneer have? 1.3 The contextual features of change in Faslane , (Kaleidoscope Model ) 2. Compare and contrast the internal features of the organizational when it was run by the MOD and Royal Navy (Up to 2001) with when it was run by Babcock Marine (2002-2010). You should apply McKinsey’s Seven S framework (do this twice – once for ‘up to 2001’ and once for 2002-2010) and discuss your findings. What, for example, where the most significant differences? You may additionally use any other relevant academic readings to develop and support your ideas. 2.1 McKinsey’s Seven S framework The McKinseys Seven S structure grew by well-known business specialist Robert H Waterman Tom Peters in 1980. McKinseys Seven S system is an administration model which incorporate Strategy, Structure, Systems, staff, style and style. McKinseys Seven S structure is habitually utilized as an Organizational examination instrument to quantify and screen changes in the inward state of an association. 2.1.1 Importance of McKinseys Seven S structure †¢ Examine the execution of an organization. †¢To rearrange authoritative change. †¢ To close how best to actualize arranged technique. †¢ Inspect the probable impacts of inevitable changes inside an organ 2.1.2 McKinsey’s Seven S framework Mainly McKinsey’s Seven S framework can be divided in to two major categories, they are hard elements and Soft Elements Strategy – The plan formulated to continue and build competitive benefit over the competition. Over-all, strategy is the one that’s obviously expressed, is long-term, helps to grasp competitive benefit and is reinforced by sturdy vision, mission and values. Structure Strategy signifies the way business divisions and units are planned and contains the data of who is responsible to whom. In other words, structure is the organizational map of the firm. It is also one of the most noticeable and easy to change fundamentals of the framework. Systems – Systems are the methods and actions of the organization, which expose business’ regular happenings and how choices are made. Systems are the zone of the firm that concludes how business is done and it would be the main attention for managers through organizational adjustment. Shared values – Share values can be highlighted as the core of McKinsey’s Seven S framework. Shared values are generating an organization that admirations each and every worker, committed to the environment and constantly attempts for waste elimination and perfection in everything it does. Skills Skills are the capabilities that firm’s workers accomplish very well. They also contain competences and capabilities. During administrative conversion the question often rises of what skills the company will really necessity to strengthen its fresh strategy or different construction. Staff – The general meaning of staff is the employees and their general competences. Staff component is apprehensive with what type or how many workers an organization will require and how they will be employed, educated, encouraged and satisfied. Style Style signifies the way the company is control by top managers and how they intermingle, what movements do they take and their representative value. In addition style is the administration style of company’s leaders. 2.2 Faslane run by the Royal Navy and MOD (up to 2001) 2.3 Falsane run by the Babcock Marine (2002-2010) Critically evaluate the Faslane change using Kotter’s change steps. Establishing a sense of urgency Faslane needed prompt change so Babcock assumed control over the administration framework and continue for change. They need to decrease cost and enhance operation proficiency without influencing administrations to Navy. Creating the guiding coalition They urge staffs to impart thoughts and insight additionally give energy to make own gathering and arrangement for division. They lessens administration layer to 4. Developing a change vision They make focus to attain to 76 million of expense sparing in 5 years period without influencing the administrations gave to the Navy. They help and bolster representatives to embrace the change process. Communicating the vision of buy in Babcock Marine decrease administration layer to 4and make association structure straightforward. They completely bolster representative for change and make a point to accomplish the association objective. Empowering broad based action They decrease political interference and administration layer. They likewise evacuate the trepidation of representatives for change process. Experience workers for change methodology were brought so that other existing representatives of Faslane will embrace change rapidly. Generating short term wins They effectively actualize change in low level and change impression of worker that change methodology is for good. They enhance execution and quality in administrations. They additionally break their 5 years plan and make yearly target which was to attain to 3 million however they had the capacity accomplish 14 million. Never letting up Babcock Marine discover positive change after lessen in worker view of apprehension and administration layer. New administration style was ideal to accomplish the focus of association. Incorporating changes into the culture The new administration and administration for Faslane was accomplishment to meet target. They enhance the quality and administrations for client. Thus, Faslane got opportunity to oversee whole UKs submarine armada. Would you describe the strategic change process at Faslane as more â€Å"intended† or more â€Å"emergent†? You should use examples from the case and relevant academic reading to support your answer Emergent Faslane was in requirement for quick change, so in 2002 they cooperate with Babcock Marine with understanding of acquiring positive change entire association. They have an arrangement to attain to  £76 million of expense sparing in five years of period without influencing the administrations gave to the Navy. Meanwhile for accomplishing their targets they apply distinctive expected and new technique according to needed. Change was not simple for Babcock in light of the fact that at first the client was not to support them. So to change individuals outlook Babcock begin to spurring for change as their acquiring was taking into account the sparing of the expense. Babcock urges to impart new thoughts and insight through entire day exchange. Babcock was knowledgeable about change process they knew the things need to decrease and enhanced in Faslane. They reengineer the structure of an association. By decreasing the administration layer from 7 to 4 they were accomplishment to decrease c ost and enhanced operational adequacy without influencing in nature of administrations. They concentrate on straightforward correspondence through and through level of administration. They decrease around 400 full-time equal posts. From distinctive explanatory apparatuses used to examine for inward and outside change environment make us straightforward the particular change prepare in Faslane. Babcock has admirably utilized their experience and method for change process which make them accomplishment to attain to their target furthermore more than desire CONCLUSION The contextual analysis demonstrated that particularly amid times of progress a trade of expertise is indispensable. This exchange must happen in the middle of new and experienced workers, generalists and experts, et cetera. Likewise, it got to be clear that cost decreases and administration upgrades are conceivable in the meantime. What is required is a reasonable objective (key pioneers obligation), a certain independence for representatives (constrained self-rule is liable to be ineffectual because of long choice making techniques) and the incorporation of every single influenced partner in the change process (clients, workers, nearby group, and so forth if there should be an occurrence of Faslane). Faslane has possessed the capacity to consent to all the five components of Successful and viable key authority. It had the capacity impart associations motivation to all the partners. It was additionally fruitful in keeping up moral standard and overseeing HUMAN RESOURCES. With its great execution, it had the capacity meet its target and had the capacity deal with the whole UK submarines armada. Proof for this administration style being successful can be seen in the choice that Faslane would turn into the home base for atomic submarines as well as for the whole UK submarines armada which means up to 2000 more JOBS. Faslane was extremely intriguing contextual investigation and considered associations MANAGEMENT and by what method can shrewd changes influence everything. Referencing A. Franken, C. Edward, and R. Lambert, ‘Executing Strategic Change’, California Management Review, (2009), pp. 49-71. Lynch, R., (2009) Strategic Management, 5th Edition, Prentice Hall J. Kotter, ‘What leaders really do’, Harvard Business Review, December (2001) Johnson, Gerry, and Kevan Scholes. Exploring Corporate Strategy. London: Prentice Hall Europe, 1999. Print. Johnson, Gerry et al. Integrated Business Applications. Frenchs Forest, N.S.W.: Pearson Australia, 2013. Print. Kotter, and Kotter International. The 8-Step Process for Leading Change Kotter International. Kotter International. N.p., 2015. Web. 3 Apr. 2015. Kotterinternatinal . 2014. The 8-Step Process for Leading Change. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.kotterinternational.com/the-8-step-process-for-leading-change/. [Accessed 22 April 15]. Ambrosini, VeÃÅ' ronique, Gerry Johnson, and Kevan Scholes. Exploring Techniques Of Analysis And Evaluation In Strategic Management. London: Prentice Hall Europe, 1998. Print. 1

Friday, January 17, 2020

Ethical Egoism as Moral Theory

Thesis: Without a distinct framework, ethical egoism fails as a moral theory to assist moral decision making because it endorses the animalistic nature of humanity, fails to provide a viable solution to a conflict of interest, and is proved to be an evolutionary unstable moral strategy. Outline: Ethical egoism claims that all our actions can be reduced to self-interest. This is a controversial moral theory which sometimes can be detrimental.Without a well-defined framework of the nature of self-interest, ethical egoism enlarges the animalistic nature of humanity in which can result in unfavorable consequences. Ethical egoism also fails to provide a solution when a conflict of interest arises. By only acting out of one’s self interest, ethical egoism also deems to be an evolutionary unstable moral theory. Ethical Egoism As a Moral Theory Identifying fundamental principles about ethics and morality has always been a major concern across humanity as a whole.Many are familiar with statements like those of ‘common sense morality’ and utilitarianism, but perhaps among the most controversial of these statements is ethical egoism. Ethical egoism is a normative theory on how we ought to behave, that we have no moral duty except to do what is best for ourselves. It advocates morality based on self-interest. In Rachels’ Ethical Egoism, the author proposes different arguments in favor and against ethical egoism as a moral theory but only come to a conclusion that ethical egoism is â€Å"unacceptably arbitrary† and fails to treat everyone equally.Without a distinct framework, ethical egoism fails as a moral theory to assist moral decision making because it endorses the animalistic nature of humanity, fails to provide a viable solution to a conflict of interest, and is proved to be an evolutionary unstable moral strategy. Ethical egoism does not provide a moral basis for the nature of self-interest or solving conflicts between people. An eth ical theory should set forth a ground such that it can constitute for a principle of morality. We should be able to agree that this theory of ethics is moral and has moral principles.However, in the case of ethical egoism, it advocates that all men ought to act from their self-interest but does not clearly state the nature of the ‘self-interest’. For all we know, when one acts out of his/her self-interest, it can very well be something that is morally incorrect. Does the theory still hold when a rapist raped a girl and think it is in his best interest to kill the girl so he won’t get caught? On a certain level, ethical egoism does not only fail to take into account the nature of ‘self-interest’ but also endorse wrong-doings and mischievousness.In Haidt’s The Felicity of Virtue, the author claims that philosophers like Plato and Kant believe that human beings have a dual nature: part animal and part rational. The animal part follows the law of nature where there is â€Å"no morality† and only causality whereas the rational part â€Å"respect rules of conduct, and so people can be judged morally for the degree to which they respect the right rules† (Haidt, 162). This animal nature illustrates exactly how ethical egoism can endorse selfishness because ethical egoism resides on the animalistic human nature and does not recommend the rational part of human beings.Without a solid ground for moral basis and taking account into rational nature of morality, ethical theory fails to constitute as a moral theory. Ethical theory fails to provide a solution when there is a conflict of interest. A moral theory is a system which we determine the right and wrong conduct, and how we ought to behave in a certain way, however, ethical egoism doesn’t fulfill its duty as a moral theory. Ethical egoism claims that all our actions can be reduced to self-interest and acting against it is immoral.On a larger level, ethical eg oism is subjective and in a way somewhat solipsistic. It doesn’t contemplate other’s feelings but our own. If my neighbor is abusing their child everyday, but the act itself does not affect me or do me any harm or good, so according to ethical egoism, it is not in my best interest to interfere. The theory is stated such that each man believes everyone should act out of their best interest, however; it might not be in one’s self interest to have everyone act from the perspective of their self-interests.In fact, Plato used the example of Gyges’ Ring to illustrate that when â€Å"one thinks that he can safely be unjust, there he is unjust, for any men believe in their hearts that injustice is far more profitable to the individual than justice† (Plato, 547). If a starving child and a naughty child both find a candy on the street, it is in both their interest to fight for the candy because eating the candy make them both happy. In this case, who should have the candy?Philosopher Plato’s brother, Glaucon actually hypothesized that egotistic power seeking might be the ‘ideal state of existence’ but quickly refuted because others might seek the same power, â€Å"which would interfere with our freedom and cause a state of chaos in which no one was likely to have any desire fulfilled† (Plato, 545). Plato eventually concludes that we should choose the life of the just even though maybe unfortunate because it is the moral thing to do. Without providing a fundamental principle of what is â€Å"the right thing to do†, ethical egoism fails to provide a solution when there is a conflict of interest.Ethical egoism is an â€Å"evolutionary unstable strategy† according to the Law of Jungles. Ethical egoism proposes that each person ought always to pursue his or her own self-interest exclusively. This idea of self-interest based morality is very much similar to the â€Å"Cheats† mentioned in J. L M ackie’s The Law of Jungles. The author claims that if the population only consists of cheats and suckers, then the Cheats will eventually wipe out the Suckers because Cheats only receive grooming but not vice versa out of their own interest. However, if put together with Grudgers, the Cheats will eventually die out because they are evolutionary unstable.Mackie claims in his piece that â€Å"this strategy is not only evolutionarily stable within a population, it is also viable for a population as a whole† (Mackie, 563). It can be mirrored in our case of ethical egoism that in the modern society, if one acts as a Cheat and acts only out of his or her own best interest, it might lead to unfavorable consequences. By supporting only individual’s self interest, ethical egoism does not serve as an evolutionary stable moral theory. Ethical Egoism has always served as controversial for its advocacy of a self-interest based morality.Many statements disagree with it such a s the virtue hypothesis states when â€Å"morality is reduced to the opposite of self-interest†, acting against your self-interest is in your self-interest (Haidt, 164). Although ethical egoism accounts for our selfish and animalistic nature, it fails to provide a framework of the nature of self-interest and what is the right thing to do when a conflict of interest arises. Ethical egoism also proves to be an evolutionary unstable strategy when put in the evolutionary prospective. Without a viable framework, ethical egoism does not constitute as a moral theory.

Thursday, January 9, 2020

The State Of The United States Lotteries - 1555 Words

In the United States, lotteries are coordinated by the legislature amid the colonial and revolutionary period to raise assets which would be used to support infrastructure, bridges and schools. Amid the post-civil war, Congress authorized a progression of preventive policies which banned lottery activities. From 1895 to 1963, each state banned lotteries and vetoed them as a source of compensation. Consequently, in 1963, the state lottery was reinstated as a government, enterprise and an origin of income by the state of New Hampshire. In many states the administration runs the lottery as an imposing business model on a substantial scale for organized gambling. The only legal competition that the lottery has, is with other state governments,†¦show more content†¦The profit from managing the state lottery is measured as a tax on tickets sold for 60% of the public adults that play (Hyman, 2014, p397). â€Å"When the soldiers had crucified Jesus, they divided his clothes among the four of them. They also took his robe, but it was seamless, woven in one piece from top to bottom. So they said, â€Å"Rather than tearing it apart, let’s throw dice for it.† This fulfilled the Scripture that says, â€Å"They divided my garments among themselves and threw dice for my clothing.† So that is what they did† (John 19:23-24 NLT) Lotteries are in a general sense not the same as other gambling in one essential way: they are afforded only by the state. The lottery is more than a disputable approach to add a minimal expenditure to state capitals. Some may argue that lotteries are a tax on the underprivileged, a tax on individuals who are mathematically challenged, even a tax on the stupid, but most people don’t actually believe the lottery is a tax. According to Henry Fielding â€Å"Lotteries are taxable, upon all the fools in creation; And Heav’n be praised, it is easily raised, Credulity’s always in Fashion; For, Folly’s a Fund, will never lose Ground; While Fools are so rife in the Nation† (Henry Fielding, 1989, p 215). As stated by Business Insider â€Å"lotteries are regressive taxes on underprivileged individuals, in that a ticket costs somewhat more for a deprived individual than a wealthy individual, and punitive taxes on poor people and uneducated

Wednesday, January 1, 2020

Examples Of Glory And Glory In The Iliad - 1054 Words

Haley Vinson English 271 December 4, 2017 Glory and Honor in Homer’s Iliad Thesis: Great honor comes with great responsibility. Glory should come with wisdom. Homer presents this idea in various ways. This theme is woven through The Iliad showing the foundation of dignified heroes and self-glorification. Introduction: I. Honor and glory A. Heroic actions B. God-like glory II. Social Status A. Greek Society B. Recognition and influences III. Mortality and immortality A. Glory after death B. Ongoing honor Conclusion Haley Vinson English 271 December 5, 2017 Glory and Honor in Homer’s Iliad In ancient Greek culture social status was based on prominence and rank. This prepotency over the culture is shown†¦show more content†¦The outcome of the actions of these warriors is battle and bloodshed as the way to achieve this glory. Achilles is the main war hero in the poem. He is passionate, enraged, and vain. The temper Achilles possesses causes the atrocious actions he commits. As courageous as he was, he was unable at first to grasp the concept of pure character. After his actions and their consequences become clear, he begins to understand the meaning of ones true-self. This gives Achilles a purpose: to chose between life and dignity. Hector is known for being the most courageous warrior of all Troy. He is the Trojan warrior that seizes the need for battle. In the poem he becomes Achilles enemy after the death of Patroklos (Homer Book 16). Hector does not compare to Achilles other than his need for honor. Both of these men are fighting for not only their glory, but for their people as well. Social status was the major concept of the Greek society. This is around the time that we would call The Homeric Society. The Homeric Society was a time period that was based specifically off of Homer’s epic poems, indicating a time of social restoration and rebirth of idolizing a monarchy (Keller 5). The Greeks used the idea of power to make their culture fit for a more noble order of society. According to the book Greece in the Making, â€Å"All of these poems belong to a world where political authority is being debatedShow MoreRelatedThe Iliad : Greeks And Their Love For War1568 Words   |  7 PagesAffourtit Affourtit.2 February 10th, 2017 CLAS1101 The Iliad: Greeks and Their Love for ‘War’ It has long been a popular scholarly opinion that the Greeks in the Iliad were lovers of war and violence. The Greeks were most definitely primal beasts, and blood shedders, a fact made abundantly clear in the Iliad. However, I think that the Greeks were not lovers of war, furthermore I think this interpretation is shortsighted. The amount of violence in the Iliad seems to be evidence for their love of war, butRead MoreTheme Of Glory In The Iliad774 Words   |  4 PagesAndy Dai Term Paper 1 The idea of kleos otherwise known as glory in Greek, and honor is one of the most essential motifs of the Iliad. For many warriors depicted in the Iliad, honor was vital and personal. For many, Glory earned in battle was more important than one’s life. Glory or the lack of, was remembered long after one’s life. Possibly the greatest fundamental part of honor to the fighters of the Iliad was courage in battle as shown throughout multiple books. Throughout the course of thisRead MoreTying Homers Iliad to Virgils Aeneid Through the Theme of Warfare1487 Words   |  6 PagesHomers Iliad to Virgils Aeneid. However, the way warfare is treated in the two epics is different. This can be attributed to many factors including the time between the composition of the pieces, the fact that pieces were written by different authors, and the fact that the pieces were written in different places. We can use these pieces to get a view of what the society that produced them thought a bout war and how the view of war changed as time went on in the ancient world. The Iliad is a poemRead MoreIliad and Achilles Speech849 Words   |  4 Pagesthe Iliad. This distinct pattern can be seen in Achilles, one of the most vital characters in the story. Achilles, being the ultimate most powerful warrior of all time, wishes for nothing in his life but to be the most glorious man alive, mortal or immortal. It is this profound desire for glory and honor, that in the end leads to his demise. Achilles speech, given while he is distraught over the death of his closest friend Patroklos, is an excellent example of Achilles#8217; desire (Iliad, 18Read MoreThe Iliad Herioc Code1444 Words   |  6 PagesKenneth Ballard CLA 202: Classical Epic: Gods and Heroes Paper #1 The heroic code in the Iliad is expressed by many characters throughout the book, whether it be through their actions, intentions, or teachings. The heroic code stems from the belief that honor is, above all, the most important virtue in life and all men must honor themselves, their families, and their fellow comrades through specific character traits and actions. This concept is the primary goal in a Homeric hero’s lifeRead MoreExistentialism And Akhilleus : State Of Affairs1182 Words   |  5 PagesAkhilleus’ State of Affairs in Homer’s Iliad Existentialism is a philosophy that deals with human existence. This philosophy is a complex subject that asks questions about life that include meaning, purpose, choice, morality, ideology, and individuality. When reading other texts one could easily make connections to existential themes within the book’s literary tropes. Occasionally, some books have an overloaded abundance of existential themes. Homer’s Iliad is one of the books that comprise of anRead MoreRamayana and the Illiad1506 Words   |  7 PagesTekwani Professor November 22, 2011 Second Writing Assignment Ramayana and the Iliad are two important literature pieces from Greece and India, both plays are set in time when Gods were known to make appearance on normal basis. The plays are main characters are Achilles and Ram, Achilles is a demi god and Ram is an incarnation of God Vishnu. In the Iliad, Achilles is an arrogant warrior who goes to war to claim glory and fame. In the Ramayana, Ram is a prince who is exiled to the forest. So whatRead MoreAssumptions About Proper Behavior989 Words   |  4 Pages The Iliad is a heroic epic poem, which depicts the events of the Trojan war. As discussed in class it was written by Homer, a significant ancient Greek poet sometime in the 8th century BC. The story appears to take place in the 13th century BC, yet mirrors the standard of living of the Dark Age (Early Iron Age).1 There are assumptions made in Book 9 of The Essential Iliad about proper human behavior, specifically about proper behavior during time of war; pertaining to warriors. It was assumed thatRead MoreMy essay is about masculinity in the Iliad and how gender roles in turn cause a war versus oneself (the title)1293 Words   |  6 PagesThe War Versus Oneself During the time period in which the Iliad took place there was a great emphasis put on masculinity. Five specific qualities were required to obtain the venerable title of a hero. Firstly, one must be born unto noble birth. For instance, a man born from the social status of a servant would cause the man to be immediately looked down on for his rankings among his higher status social counterparts. Secondly, the hero must attain strength. Without strength, the man cannot proveRead MoreThe Iliad Of The Homer s Iliad Essay1475 Words   |  6 PagesThe Iliad ranks as one of the most important and most influential works in terms of world literatures since its establishment. Between the underlying standard to which the Iliad offers us as audience members, along with the plethora of writers that have followed in the footsteps to which Homer’s Iliad paved, the impact that the Iliad has played is remarkable in itself. While the Iliad can be credited for much of present day literature we study today, Hollywood can be created for the plethora of